|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Run pgindent now?|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:32:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Are we ready for a pgindent run? Back branches?
> I think we could do it in HEAD, but it doesn't seem like we have consensus
> about whether to touch the back branches. Suggest just HEAD for now and
> we can continue to argue about the back branches.
Here is a re-run of pgindent on 9.4:
It is 5.7k line diff. I didn't do pre-9.4 because pgindent was slightly
modified before the 9.4 run, so there would be additional changes in
those back branches.
If we wanted to do this on backbranches, I think we would create a diff
file of the minor release just before running pgindent and stamping so
users could see the non-pgindent content of the release. A crazy idea
would be to release of just pgindent changes so we would not add
pgindent changes into a fix release.
+ Everyone has their own god. +
|Next Message||Uriy Zhuravlev||2015-05-25 16:44:57||Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR|
|Previous Message||Davin M. Potts||2015-05-25 16:38:36||Re: [Pgbuildfarm] buildfarm olinguito vs python|