Re: Cygwin vs "win32" in configure

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin vs "win32" in configure
Date: 2015-03-15 18:12:30
Message-ID: 20150315181230.GA29732@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2015-03-15 14:03:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Buildfarm member brolga seems unhappy with my commit 91f4a5a that
> restricted port/dirmod.c to being built only on "Windows". Evidently
> we need to build it when $PORTNAME = "cygwin" as well, which is fine;
> but I'm a bit astonished that none of the other stuff inserted in the
> "# Win32 support" stanza beginning at configure.in line 1440 is needed
> for cygwin builds. Is that really correct, or am I misunderstanding
> what's happening here?

Those all sound like things that cygwin is going to emulate for us. I
guess we could use more of those functions to reduce the difference, but
I'm not sure it's worth it.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-15 18:28:00 Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-15 18:03:08 Cygwin vs "win32" in configure