Re: New CF app deployment

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New CF app deployment
Date: 2015-03-03 16:11:22
Message-ID: 20150303161122.GE5726@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:58:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would you suggest removing the automated system completely, or keep it around
> > and just make it possible to override it (either by removing the note that
> > something is a patch, or by making something that's not listed as a patch
> > become marked as such)?
>
> One counter-idea would be to assume every attachment is a patch _unless_
> the attachment type matches a pattern that identifies it as not a patch.
>
> However, I agree with Tom that we should go a little longer before
> changing it.

Also, can we look inside the attachment to see if it starts with
'diff<space>'.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-03 16:15:13 Re: Maximum number of WAL files in the pg_xlog directory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-03 16:09:29 Re: autogenerated column names + views are a dump hazard