Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > +#define GetModifiedColumns(relinfo, estate) \
> > > > + (rt_fetch((relinfo)->ri_RangeTableIndex, (estate)->es_range_table)->modifiedCols)
> > >
> > > I assume you are aware that this GetModifiedColumns() macro is a
> > > duplicate of another one found elsewhere. However I think this is not
> > > such a hot idea; the UPSERT patch series has a preparatory patch that
> > > changes that other macro definition, as far as I recall; probably it'd
> > > be a good idea to move it elsewhere, to avoid a future divergence.
> >
> > Yeah, I had meant to do something about that and had looked around but
> > didn't find any particularly good place to put it. Any suggestions on
> > that?
>
> Hmm, tough call now that I look it up. This macro depends on
> ResultRelInfo and EState, both of which are in execnodes.h, and also on
> rt_fetch which is in parsetree.h. There is no existing header that
> includes parsetree.h (only .c files), so we would have to add one
> inclusion on some other header file, or create a new header with just
> this definition. None of these sounds real satisfactory (including
> parsetree.h in execnodes.h sounds very bad). Maybe just add a comment
> on both definitions to note that they are dupes of each other? That
> would be more backpatchable that anything else that occurs to me right
> away.

Good thought, I'll do that.

Thanks!

Stephen