Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised.

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised.
Date: 2014-12-17 03:39:22
Message-ID: 20141217.123922.69865806.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

> On 2014-12-15 18:19:26 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > Since I don't have clear idea how to promote this, I will remake
> > and be back with new patch based on Andres' for patches.
>
> Do my patches miss any functionality you want?

The patch satisfies what I want, as I said upthread. What I don't
know is how I can go on with it in this CF topic, in other word
what should I do in order to put it to "ready for committer"?

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2014-12-17 05:27:01 Re: speedup tidbitmap patch: hash BlockNumber
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-17 03:35:27 Re: On partitioning