| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Serge Negodyuck <petr(at)petrovich(dot)kiev(dot)ua>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby |
| Date: | 2014-06-06 18:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20140606180826.GW5146@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > After some simplification I think it should be clearer. Thanks Andres
> > for commenting offlist.
>
> I find this not only unreadable but a bit scary:
>
> ! if (offset + MAX_MEMBERS_IN_LAST_MEMBERS_PAGE < offset)
>
> I'm worried whether some compilers might not decide that that's a
> can't-happen situation, and optimize the test away entirely. I think
> Andres' proposal is probably safer (though it needs comments).
Well, somebody would have to work it out fully and test it -- I can't
spend more time on this issue. If somebody is interested in doing that,
I used this little program and make sure that it "zeroes" all pages, for
various block sizes, initial offsets and "step sizes" (#members in each
multi) -- I was able to reproduce Serge's issues with the original
coding, and then watch issues fly by as I tried several approaches until
I settled on the patch as submitted.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| multixact.c | text/x-csrc | 3.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Fiske | 2014-06-06 20:22:57 | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-06 17:16:56 | Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-06-06 18:51:59 | Re: Proposing pg_hibernate |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-06-06 17:18:24 | Re: Re: popen and pclose redefinitions causing many warning in Windows build |