From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Date: | 2014-04-22 12:55:08 |
Message-ID: | 20140422125508.GK2556@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> I didn't realize we had a guc for dynamic shared memory, must've missed
> that in the discussion about that one. I agree that if we have that, it
> makes perfect sense to have the same setting available for the main shared
> memory segment.
I recall the back-and-forth about the issues with dynamic shared memory
but I had hoped they would result in a solution that didn't involve
having to support both..
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-04-22 13:29:32 | Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6 |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2014-04-22 12:30:24 | Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6 |