Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-22 12:55:08
Message-ID: 20140422125508.GK2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> I didn't realize we had a guc for dynamic shared memory, must've missed
> that in the discussion about that one. I agree that if we have that, it
> makes perfect sense to have the same setting available for the main shared
> memory segment.

I recall the back-and-forth about the issues with dynamic shared memory
but I had hoped they would result in a solution that didn't involve
having to support both..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-04-22 13:29:32 Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2014-04-22 12:30:24 Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6