Re: running make check with only specified tests

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: running make check with only specified tests
Date: 2014-01-27 01:17:21
Message-ID: 20140127011720.GH10723@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Anyway, I have no great objection to the proposed patch, I'm just dubious
> that it's really worth the trouble. If you do go through with it, I'd
> suggest adding an installcheck-with variant.
>
> In the bikeshedding department, maybe "-tests" instead of "-with"?

No objection to the proposed idea either, but I wanted to point out that
I had the idea sometime ago that each test would declare which other
test it depended on; so if you specify one to run in isolation, the ones
it depended on got run beforehand. I never got around to implementing
it because running the whole bunch doesn't take that long anyway, but if
for some reason you want to run a specific test over and over, it is
useful.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-01-27 01:50:58 Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view
Previous Message Greg Stark 2014-01-27 01:11:38 Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary