Re: relscan_details.h

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: relscan_details.h
Date: 2013-10-02 12:59:42
Message-ID: 20131002125942.GB137331@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on
> people who use our code, we are positioning our code on a slow decline
> in clarity.
>
> What I don't want to do is get into a mode where every code cleanup has
> to be verified that it isn't going to excessively burden outside code
> users. Cleanup is hard enough, and adding another check to that process
> makes cleanup even less likely.

I don't disagree with that, but I would describe the proposal as a mild
dirty-up for the sake of build performance, not a cleanup.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sameer Thakur 2013-10-02 13:10:51 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2013-10-02 12:07:13 Re: No Index-Only Scan on Partial Index