|From:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>|
|Cc:||Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Minmax indexes|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Erik Rijkers wrote:
> I have the impression it's not quite working correctly.
> The attached program returns different results for different values of enable_bitmapscan (consistently).
Clearly there's some bug somewhere. I'll investigate it more.
> ( Btw, I had to make the max_locks_per_transaction higher for even not-so-large tables -- is that expected? For a 100M row
> table, max_locks_per_transaction=1024 was not enough; I set it to 2048. Might be worth some documentation, eventually. )
Not documentation -- that would also be a bug which needs to be fixed.
Thanks for testing.
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
|Next Message||Jim Nasby||2013-09-26 18:45:21||Re: dynamic shared memory|
|Previous Message||Alvaro Herrera||2013-09-26 17:39:07||Re: Minmax indexes|