Re: record identical operator

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator
Date: 2013-09-20 18:50:18
Message-ID: 20130920185017.GC4832@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine escribió:

> My understanding is that if you choose citext then you don't care at all
> about the case, so that the two relations actually yield the same
> results for the right definition of "same" here: the citext one.

For the record, I don't think citext means that the user doesn't care"
about the case; it only means they want the comparisons to be
case-insensitive, but case should nonetheless be preserved. That is,
"case-insensitive, case-preserving". A parallel is MS-DOS file name
semantics.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-09-20 18:58:56 Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-20 18:30:25 Re: UTF8 national character data type support WIP patch and list of open issues.