Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-06-15 21:31:15
Message-ID: 20130615213115.GA7754@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-06-15 11:36:54 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 18:27 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'd like to see a comment around the memcpys in XLogSaveBufferForHint()
> > that mentions that they are safe in a non std buffer due to
> > XLogCheckBuffer setting an appropriate hole/offset. Or make an explicit
> > change of the copy algorithm there.
>
> Done.
> Also done.

Thanks! Looks good to me.

> Patch attached. Also, since we branched, I think this should be
> back-patched to 9.3 as well.

Absolutely.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-15 21:45:21 Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2013-06-15 20:30:50 Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls