Re: Heads up on Postgres security release coming April 4, 2013

From: web(at)mr-paradox(dot)net
To: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
Cc: john melesky <list(at)phaedrusdeinus(dot)org>, web(at)mr-paradox(dot)net, Postgresql PDX_Users <pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Heads up on Postgres security release coming April 4, 2013
Date: 2013-04-04 19:00:34
Message-ID: 20130404190034.GB81713@mr-paradox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pdxpug

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
- On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
-
- > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:41:45PM +0000, john melesky wrote:
- > - > Can anyone confirm if this is the correct version for the security fix?
- > - >
- > - > postgresql92-server.x86_64 9.2.4-1PGDG.rhel6 @pgdg-92-centos
- > -
- > - 9.2.4 is the correct version, according to the release notice:
- > -
- > - http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1456/
- >
- > Yeah, but it also says it affects 9.2.4:
- > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Group has released a security update to
- > all current versions of the
- > PostgreSQL database system, including versions 9.2.4"
- >
-
- The meaning was "the updates include: version, version, version, version"

That makes sense, and what I would normally expect. I don't know why I read this
one differently.

Also, unbeknownst to me, my dev machines have auto-update for security on
so I was wondering how I already had it =)

Thanks again!

In response to

Browse pdxpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gabrielle 2013-05-21 03:36:14 books, June meeting, OSCON booth signup
Previous Message Selena Deckelmann 2013-04-04 18:55:06 Re: Heads up on Postgres security release coming April 4, 2013