Re: obsolete code

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obsolete code
Date: 2013-02-01 16:31:22
Message-ID: 20130201163122.GB16126@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> but some users uses V0 for glibc functions - it is probably ugly hack,
> but it allows using external libraries - and should be possible still
> use it

No, I don't think we need or want to continue to support such an ugly,
ugly, hack.

+1 for adding a V0 and requiring it.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-02-01 16:34:58 Re: pkg-config files for libpq and ecpg
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-02-01 16:27:28 Re: obsolete code