From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2012-11-26 21:37:17 |
Message-ID: | 20121126213717.GD1962@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
> >> "snapshot", not a materialized view. Maybe that's what it should
> >> be called then.
> >
> > "Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle
> > materialized view. There are others, which we'll eventually add
> > if past is any prologue :)
>
> That's the way I understand it, too.
Great :)
> > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> > REFRESH options to come.
>
> I would prefer to leave the syntax for refreshing MVs to a later
> patch. I'm kind of assuming that SNAPSHOT would be the default if
> no other options are specified, but I would prefer not to get into
> too much speculation about add-on patches for fear of derailing
> this initial effort.
You're right. I withdraw my suggestion until such time as this patch
(or descendent) is committed and actual working code implementing
other refresh strategies is written.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-11-26 21:39:39 | Re: Re: Problem Observed in behavior of Create Index Concurrently and Hot Update |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-11-26 21:34:36 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |