Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2012-11-26 21:34:36
Message-ID: 20121126213436.127710@gmx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
>> "snapshot", not a materialized view. Maybe that's what it should
>> be called then.
>
> "Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle
> materialized view. There are others, which we'll eventually add
> if past is any prologue :)

That's the way I understand it, too.

> I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> REFRESH options to come.

I would prefer to leave the syntax for refreshing MVs to a later
patch. I'm kind of assuming that SNAPSHOT would be the default if
no other options are specified, but I would prefer not to get into
too much speculation about add-on patches for fear of derailing
this initial effort.

-Kevin

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2012-11-26 21:37:17 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2012-11-26 21:24:33 Re: Materialized views WIP patch