Re: [GENERAL] Estimated rows question

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sam Ross <elliptic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Estimated rows question
Date: 2012-09-13 01:48:16
Message-ID: 20120913014816.GA12960@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:19:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sam Ross <elliptic(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Do you want to try it and submit a patch for testing?
>
> > Thanks for the answer, and sorry for the slow reply - I'm not sure
> > I have the necessary expertise, but I'll be happy to give it a
> > shot. Is there an already-assembled library of queries that is
> > used to test purported improvements to the planner, or is it
> > expected that I come up with a convincing test-set myself?
>
> No, we don't really have much in that line :-(.

Does anyone? If so, who?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-09-13 02:18:41 Re: Tables with lots of dead tuples despite autovacuum
Previous Message Sébastien Lorion 2012-09-13 01:32:23 Re: Amazon High I/O instances

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-13 03:22:50 Re: git author vs committer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-12 23:19:06 Re: [GENERAL] Estimated rows question