Re: remove dead ports?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?
Date: 2012-05-03 14:59:36
Message-ID: 20120503145936.GF21098@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:39:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:29:39PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I propose that we remove support for the following OS ports from our
> > source tree. They are totally dead, definitely don't work, and/or
> > probably no one remembers what they even were. The code just bit rots
> > and is in the way of future improvements.
> >
> > * Dead/remove:
> >
> > dgux
> > nextstep
> > sunos4
> > svr4
> > ultrix4
> > univel
> >
> > * Dubious, but keep for now:
> >
> > bsdi
>
> I am no longer on bsdi and I bet there are no more existing users
> either. It can be removed, I think.

Having received no replies on "general" from bsdi users considering
upgrading to 9.2, I have removed the port.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-03 15:01:55 Re: pgsql: Remove dead ports
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-05-03 14:58:12 Re: "unexpected EOF" messages