| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |
| Date: | 2011-04-18 23:34:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20110418233405.GA2769@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:44:53PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:57 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > * Users can CREATE TABLE OF on a type they don't own
> > This in turns blocks the owner's ability to alter the table/type. However, we
> > already have this hazard with composite-type columns. A TODO to address this
> > broadly seems in order, but it's not a 9.1 issue.
>
> I think we should change that to mirror the inheritance policy: you have
> to be the owner of the "parent". Note that this is newly relevant in
> 9.1, because you couldn't change composite types before.
Would we add that restriction to use of "CREATE TABLE t (c comptype)" as well,
or just to "CREATE TABLE t OF comptype"?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-04-18 23:50:41 | Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-18 23:25:33 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |