From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
Date: | 2011-04-18 23:25:33 |
Message-ID: | 18543.1303169133@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of lun abr 18 19:20:30 -0300 2011:
>> On 04/17/2011 11:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> ... but maybe it just needs
>>> a more determined effort and/or more recent versions of GNU indent.
>> If you're aware of any changes in GNU indent that would overcome the
>> previous issues, then by all means spend the time on it. If not, it
>> seems a bit like the definition of insanity ("repeating an experiment
>> with the expectation of a different result").
> The source of GNU indent itself is 3x what it was when the experiment
> was last reported. (I checked this about a year ago with an eye on
> "repeating the experiment" but then I failed to actually do it.) It
> seems fair to say that, yes, it has changed a bit in the meantime.
Also, my recollection of the previous go-round is that we gave up rather
quickly. Maybe by now there is somebody willing to put more than
minimal effort into getting the options just so.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-04-18 23:34:05 | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-04-18 22:28:36 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |