| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: updated patch for foreach stmt |
| Date: | 2011-02-08 21:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20110208215255.GT4116@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
> arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr. That's probably a good
> idea, because it gives us an escape hatch against needing to invent
> yet another variant of this syntax - the word immediately following IN
> can be known with confidence to be intended as a keyword rather than
> as part of the expression.
Alright, so, for lack of anything better to do, I went ahead and marked
it Ready for Committer. If that was wrong or someone wants to do
another review, etc, let me know..
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-08 21:54:45 | Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-08 21:46:12 | Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 |