Re: pg_upgrade docs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade docs
Date: 2011-01-31 20:22:58
Message-ID: 201101312022.p0VKMw426784@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have created the attached patch which rewords the mention of
> pg_upgrade in the docs. I think it is clearer and more concise. Should
> we mention that people should have a recent pg_dump? If so, that should
> be in the pg_upgrade man page, not here.

Applied attached patch that mentions pg_upgrade in a less risk-warning
way, and incorporate Robert Haas's ideas (mention storage format
changes) into pg_upgrade docs.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 2.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-02-01 05:31:02 Re: [HACKERS] Add reference to client_encoding parameter
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-01-31 18:23:09 Re: Problem with documentation of upgrades