| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_upgrade docs |
| Date: | 2011-01-28 03:42:54 |
| Message-ID: | 201101280342.p0S3gsd04950@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
I have created the attached patch which rewords the mention of
pg_upgrade in the docs. I think it is clearer and more concise. Should
we mention that people should have a recent pg_dump? If so, that should
be in the pg_upgrade man page, not here.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| /rtmp/pg_upgrade.diff | text/x-diff | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-01-28 04:38:13 | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-28 03:40:40 | Re: documentation navigation |