Re: batching commands with libpq

From: yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: batching commands with libpq
Date: 2011-01-13 00:08:59
Message-ID: 20110113000859.EDC1419CEBA@mail.netbsd.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

hi,

> yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
>> is there any way to send multiple commands together (ideally in a single
>> network packet), and then wait for their results, using libpq? i want to
>> save extra round-trips. while postgresql's fe-be on-wire protocol seems
>> to allow it (is it right?), i couldn't find a way with libpq.
>
>> PQsendQuery(conn, "select timeofday();select timeofday();select timeofday();");
>> seems to work, but i want to use extended protocol.
>
> You're out of luck: extended protocol intentionally doesn't allow
> multiple queries per string.
>
> The wire protocol does in theory allow you to send more commands before
> waiting for the results of the first one, but that's not supported in
> libpq. The only case you can do in libpq is multiple commands in a
> PQexec string.

thanks for explanation.
do you think it's worth extending the libpq api to allow two or
more in-flight commands?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message YAMAMOTO Takashi 2011-01-13 00:21:45 async fast-path calls?
Previous Message richard 2011-01-12 22:34:01 password passing between postgresql 8.4 and snort