Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date: 2010-07-02 21:43:00
Message-ID: 201007022143.o62Lh0w26764@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> OK, everyone seems to like requiring dia.
> >
> > I don't like it a bit. It's hard enough for people to build the docs as
> > it is.
>
> Why should anyone build the docs? Its part of the tarball process, so the
> only ppl that should be doing it are those coming from CVS, no ... ?

People often built them to verify the SGML markup and to view the
content/markup before submitting a doc patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-07-02 21:57:59 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-07-02 21:41:59 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams