Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date: 2010-07-02 21:41:59
Message-ID: 201007022141.o62Lfx026660@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, everyone seems to like requiring dia.
>
> I don't like it a bit. It's hard enough for people to build the docs as it is.

That was my reaction too, but I am only one person. Yeah, I know that
is hard to be belive. How can one person revert his own faulty patches
so quickly? LOL

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-07-02 21:43:00 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-07-02 21:40:27 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams