Re: Confusing Linux download page

Devrim GNDZ wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 16:34 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Basically I see the status quo as there having been a fork of RPM
> > generation, with neither side wanting to admit that there was a fork
> > in the first place ...
>
> Well, I created the yum repository, CMD owned it (which was quite
> normal), and I used the same code when I created mine, and added many
> updates since then (my repo has more packages than the other one).
>
> But this is not the whole story. I was already maintaining RPM packages
> before we created yum repository, for Fedora and for community. My
> archives say that I've been building packages since 7.2. So, which is a
> fork? I don't have a definite answer ;)
>
> Anyway, I don't want to be involved in this thread, except changing
> package suffixes. Even though I believe that I should keep PGDG suffix,
> I am really willing to change it, just to make sure that community feels
> fine.

Where are we on making the Command Prompt and Devrim RPMs use unique
suffixes?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +