Rogue TODO list created

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Rogue TODO list created
Date: 2010-04-15 01:40:17
Message-ID: 201004150140.o3F1eHC23884@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm not religious about psql's formatting; I'd be happy with
> > this information being displayed only for \d+, in whatever form makes
> > folks happy.
> >
> > I unfortunately don't have much time to try a patch myself at the moment :(
> >
>
> It's a straightforward patch to write with clear value, which we can
> always use more of. I added it to
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Prioritised_Todo#psql so people looking
> for an easy patch to chew on one day can find it.

[ Thread moved to hackers.]

What is "Prioritised" Todo? It looks like a copy of the TODO list that
was created on March 23, 2010, and only you and Simon have modified it:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Prioritised_Todo&action=history

Of course it is not getting updates that are added to the main TODO
list. What can this cause except confusion! I am hoping to hear a
reasonable explanation why this was done, and why changes are going
there instead of the main TODO list, which is here:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message raghavendra t 2010-04-15 01:50:21 Re: VACUUM process running for a long time
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-15 00:07:27 Re: Removing files under pg_clog

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-15 01:48:17 Re: Win32 timezone matching
Previous Message daveg 2010-04-15 00:54:47 Re: a faster compression algorithm for pg_dump