Re: GiST index performance

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Date: 2010-03-03 01:13:44
Message-ID: 201003030113.o231Dif26502@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Was this corrected? ?I don't see any commits to seg.c.
>
> I don't think this was ever reviewed.
>
> It seems like a good patch but I'd be skeptical of committing it now
> unless someone has the time to review it carefully. If not, let's add
> it to the next CF so we don't lose it again.

I have asked Oleg and Teodor to work on it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-03-03 01:17:47 Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-03-03 01:03:39 Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics