Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-26 13:46:24
Message-ID: 20100226134624.GA12433@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Michael, can we try to install the first two patches?

If I understood the rest of the thread correctly this is not needed anymore,
right?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-02-26 14:10:26 Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-26 13:29:41 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?