Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
Date: 2010-02-19 13:36:42
Message-ID: 20100219133642.GA5735@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> The regression test in the core is targeting only its version,
> >> but some external projects have version-independent tests.
> >
> > I think it's more like "are under the fond illusion that their tests are
> > version-independent". Are we going to back out the next incompatible
> > change we choose to make as soon as somebody notices that it breaks a
> > third-party test case? I don't think so. Let me point out that
> > choosing to install plpgsql by default has already broken "--single"
> > restore of practically every pg_dump out there. Nobody batted an eye
> > about that. Why are we suddenly so concerned about its effects on
> > unnamed test suites?
>
> Because it's a lot easier for `pg_regress --load-language=plpgsql` to mean "ensure the language is installed" than it is for 3rd-party test suites to detect what version they're being installed against.

Why doesn't the Makefile running the tests simply avoid adding
--load-language when the version is higher than 9.0? Shouldn't be a
hard test to write. We have $(MAJORVERSION) to help with this.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-02-19 13:51:39 Re: Merge join and index scan strangeness
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2010-02-19 13:14:41 Re: Merge join and index scan strangeness