Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-18 15:30:46
Message-ID: 201002181530.o1IFUkD22331@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Doesn't that require that all pgindent runs produce the same output?
>
> > True. So everyone will have to send their patches to Bruce for bit-rot
> > fixing ;-)
>
> I think Bruce ought to publish the specific typedef list he uses for
> each run (maybe commit it in src/tools/pgindent/). In principle,
> at least, that's the only variable that couldn't be reproduced by
> someone else.

OK, we can put it in src/tools/pgindent, I guess.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-18 15:38:43 Re: remove contrib/xml2
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-02-18 15:25:57 SR: "pseudo replication database of the primary" ...