Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-18 15:11:29
Message-ID: 19749.1266505889@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Doesn't that require that all pgindent runs produce the same output?

> True. So everyone will have to send their patches to Bruce for bit-rot
> fixing ;-)

I think Bruce ought to publish the specific typedef list he uses for
each run (maybe commit it in src/tools/pgindent/). In principle,
at least, that's the only variable that couldn't be reproduced by
someone else.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-18 15:13:45 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-02-18 15:09:42 Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.