Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pathological regexp match

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pathological regexp match
Date: 2010-01-29 15:51:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:

> > (There's a badly needed CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in this code BTW)
> Incidentally, I ran across the exact same issue with a non-greedy
> regexp with a client earlier this week, and put on my TODO to figure
> out a good place to stick a check for interrupts. Does this mean I
> don't have to, because you're on it? ;)

No, sorry :-(

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-01-29 16:03:59
Subject: ordered aggregates using WITHIN GROUP (was Re: can somebody execute this query on Oracle 11.2g and send result?)
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-29 15:01:12
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group