Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-01-29 15:01:12
Message-ID: 1264777272.24669.17459.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 16:44 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I removed code that you mentioned was
> > buggy because I don't have time to fix it and it is not high enough up
> > the priority list. We have discussed all of these things before yet you
> > raise them again as if those things have never been said.
>
> *sigh*. Yeah, we've been through this. As I've said before, I never said
> the code was buggy, that was just a misunderstanding at your end.

OK, if you say I misunderstood, then I accept that.

The deed is done and the code removed. Putting it back takes time and
given enough of that rare cloth, it will eventually be put back.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-01-29 15:51:03 Re: Pathological regexp match
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-01-29 14:52:38 Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution