| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pathological regexp match |
| Date: | 2010-01-29 15:51:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20100129155103.GA1982@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> > (There's a badly needed CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in this code BTW)
>
> Incidentally, I ran across the exact same issue with a non-greedy
> regexp with a client earlier this week, and put on my TODO to figure
> out a good place to stick a check for interrupts. Does this mean I
> don't have to, because you're on it? ;)
No, sorry :-(
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-01-29 16:03:59 | ordered aggregates using WITHIN GROUP (was Re: can somebody execute this query on Oracle 11.2g and send result?) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-01-29 15:01:12 | Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution |