Re: Changing the name

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Changing the name
Date: 2010-01-23 04:02:55
Message-ID: 201001230402.o0N42tg25409@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > +1 (despite what my sig says)
> >
>
> If we do this, I will reiterate that PostgreSQL is the project, Postgres
> is the database. The branding around the name is entirely too important
> and long lasting at this point.

Yea, the idea of have Postgres refer to part of the ecosystem and
PostgreSQL another part is a common approach.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-01-23 04:08:15 Re: Changing the name
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-01-23 03:47:27 Re: Changing the name