Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-07 17:15:14
Message-ID: 201001071815.15621.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 07 January 2010 18:10:43 Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Not having our release schedule driven by marketing is a *strength* of
> our project!
Yes.

> We made the mistake last time to delay the release significantly for a
> single feature. It turned out said feature didn't make it *anyway*.
> Let's not repeat that mistake.
I would consider SR to be significantly less complex than HS though.
What about giving it two weeks from now on to be in a comittable state? Last
time the main discussion started a good while *after* the last commitfest...

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-07 17:19:50 Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-07 17:14:48 Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior