Re: pg_migrator issues

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator issues
Date: 2010-01-07 12:40:00
Message-ID: 201001071240.o07Ce0V27340@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > On m<C3><A5>n, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it
> > >> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just
> > >> posted the reason and patch.
> >
> > > I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have
> > > other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I
> > > personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze.
> >
> > In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only,
> > and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this
> > spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.
>
> Oh, interesting about pg_dump. Let's just go with --analyze-only.
> --only-analyze is feeling odd to me too.

Done, attached and applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 10.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-01-07 12:44:43 Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-01-07 12:39:41 Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication)