Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina(at)gulfsat(dot)mg>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Date: 2009-12-21 06:54:41
Message-ID: 20091221095441.282240d7@pbmiha.malagasy.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> :
> Again, the audience is managers. Is there an
> impartial, 3rd party evaluation of the 2 DBs out there that
> identifies PG as being more reliable? It might mention things like
> fewer incidences of corrupt tables/indexes, fewer deamon crashes,
> better recovery after system crashes, etc... ?

I dont know if it's a plus or a minus, but:
http://www.google.com/search?&q=save+mysql+oracle

--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-12-21 06:59:58 Re: Cheapest way to poll for notifications? & Driver improvement question re SSL and notify
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-12-21 06:41:53 Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project