Re: Range types

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To:
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range types
Date: 2009-12-15 14:10:06
Message-ID: 20091215141006.GB4544@tomas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:09:02PM +0000, Greg Stark wrote:

[...]

> In fact, as I only recently found out, one of the design goals of IEEE
> floats was specifically that they sort lexicographically and use every
> bit pattern. So you can alwys get the "next" float by just
> incrementing your float as an 64-bit integer. Yes that raises your
> value by a different amount, and it's still useful.

Didn't know that -- thanks :-)

(and as Andrew Dunstan pointed out off-list: I was wrong with my bold
assertion that one can squeeze infinitely many (arbitrary length)
strings between two given. This is not always the case).

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLJ5i+Bcgs9XrR2kYRAqtUAJ0VHeUd7q/+Xr9H+Clbr2E0HVV3mgCdFXZM
/EPDk1B+M2uP6/Lqr50Rv4k=
=XICC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-15 14:52:40 Re: Range types
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-12-15 13:50:13 Re: New VACUUM FULL