From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Date: | 2009-12-15 13:50:13 |
Message-ID: | 20091215135013.GB3956@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> Here is an updated patch rebased to the latest CVS HEAD.
>
> One remaining concern is VERBOSE. Log messages by FULL (rewrite) are less
> verbose than FULL INPLACE. The same can be said for CLUSTER VERBOSE, though.
> I don't have any plans to make CLUSTER more verbose in the patch, but
> "more verbose CLUSTER" could be a TODO item.
Hmm. With this patch, if I do "vacuumdb -f" it will not vacuum the
special system catalogs that can only be vacuumed with INPLACE, correct?
If that's correct, I wonder whether it would be good to do a regular
not-inplace VF for most relations, and do INPLACE for those catalogs.
That way, if a sysadmin has a vacuumdb -f in crontab, it will continue
to do what he expects.
Maybe this is not important if Simon is able to get inplace working for
all catalogs.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tomas | 2009-12-15 14:10:06 | Re: Range types |
Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2009-12-15 13:35:00 | Compiling HEAD with -Werror int 64-bit mode |