Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?
Date: 2009-11-12 22:09:58
Message-ID: 20091112220958.GL4780@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> I wrote:
> > Fair enough. I'll start writing the custom GUC then.
>
> While testing that, I noticed [...]

With all this fallout, I think it would be cleaner to step back and make
it a regular GUC variable, not custom. Pretending that plpgsql is
somehow not an integral part of the system is not completely true
anyway. Yes, we're playing favorites in the PL camp here, but so what?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-11-12 22:11:09 Re: EOL for 7.4?
Previous Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2009-11-12 22:09:02 Re: EOL for 7.4?