| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Date: | 2009-08-20 19:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20090820190604.GK6261@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Petr Jelinek wrote:
> The implementation as I see it would create function in pg_temp
> namespace, call it and then drop it. Any other implementation would
> imho mean rewriting procedure language api.
That's really ugly. It'll cause catalog bloat with every execution.
I think it would be acceptable to have a new column in pg_language that
pointed to an anonymous block execute function. Languages that do not
define this function cannot use this new feature.
BTW I think you should start a new thread for this proposal. It has
diverged a bit from GRANT ON ALL.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ygor Degani | 2009-08-20 19:22:39 | Re: Duplicated Keys in PITR |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2009-08-20 18:57:36 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |