Re: New types for transparent encryption

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New types for transparent encryption
Date: 2009-07-07 10:17:26
Message-ID: 20090707101726.GA9083@tomas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:35:28PM +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Our manual says we can use pgcrypto functions or encrypted filesystems
> for data encryption.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/encryption-options.html

As other posters have put it, I'd be very sceptical of server-side
decryption. If the server "has" all the necessary bits to decrypt the
data, all bets are off.

[encryption might be OK, with an asymmetrical scheme in the
vein of public key cryptography].

A client-side decryption (and maybe encryption as well) seems way more
attractive. For that, libpqtypes[1],[2] might come in very handy.

[1] <http://pgfoundry.org/projects/libpqtypes/>
[2] <http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/>

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKUyC2Bcgs9XrR2kYRAiJoAJ9426t1bMtZ90690cwU9X+F4GJZkgCfZsJ2
YIon8ulaHI64l5GKbDwV4hM=
=I9fS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-07 10:20:12 Re: Small foreign key error message improvement
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-07-07 09:27:12 Re: New types for transparent encryption