| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Date: | 2009-04-27 20:02:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20090427200232.GF10358@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > > "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck,
> > > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > > many years.
> >
> > Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> > to mean basic.
>
> Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic? Seriously?
Five years from now, are we going to move "recursive queries" to the
basic section?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-27 22:13:49 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-27 19:56:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-27 22:13:49 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-27 20:00:11 | Re: XML documentation question |