| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Date: | 2009-04-27 18:54:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20090427185412.GP1539@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck,
> > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > many years.
>
> Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> to mean basic.
Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic? Seriously?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-27 19:56:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-27 18:50:13 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-27 19:56:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-27 18:52:48 | Re: XML documentation question |