From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: XML documentation question |
Date: | 2009-04-27 20:00:11 |
Message-ID: | 20090427200011.GD10358@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I updated the text to:
> > >
> > > The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> > > mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:
>
> OK, that is what is in our SGML now.
>
> > Sorry, that is completely wrong.
>
> You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?
But that was to Tom proposal, which is completely different (yes -- one
word can change the meaning of a sentence).
I agree the paragraph (even with Tom's rework) is a bit confusing to the
uninitiated. Maybe the subsection could be reflowed so that each
function is described along the corresponding XML Schema function (to
table_to_xml and table_to_xmlschema, later query_to_xml and
query_to_xmlschema and so on).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-27 20:02:32 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-27 19:56:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation |