Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: XML documentation question

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: XML documentation question
Date: 2009-04-27 18:52:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I updated the text to:
> >
> >     The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> >     mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:

OK, that is what is in our SGML now.

> Sorry, that is completely wrong.

You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?

> Are you aware of what "XML Schema" is?  Should that perhaps be explained in
> the docs?

Uh, it would be nice to explain it, yes.  My guess it that the paragraph
is much too short and needs perhaps an addtional sentence, but I have no
clue what it should be.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2009-04-27 18:54:12
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments forfirst two parts of documentation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-04-27 18:50:13
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group