| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 16:33:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421163326.GJ15679@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 12:19 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > I suggested this to Bruce over IM:
> >
> > \df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
> >
> > (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems
> > clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if
> > you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw]
> > stuff too, right?
> >
>
> +1 to Alvaro.
Now psql allows you to mix all of the options freely (scary math word
ahead) in an idempotent way. In other words, this works:
\df++aannSw
Expressed as a regex, it's \\df[antwS+]*
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | steven king | 2009-04-21 16:35:50 | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-21 16:30:37 | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |